Today is 2025.4.2
I just found another email from Sylvia Woodham which went straight through to my spam folder dated 2025.1.16
She is apparently telling me that I am wrong (she does a lot of that) for my believing in a version of events which includes her own antisocial behaviour and for evidencing that behaviour. I am starting to suspect she actually genuinely believes her own lies.
Here is her email containing her denial.
Here is the evidence her denial is a lie:
Her website still to this day has two blogs about the SL Writers Project which she was fired from for her antisocial aggressively controlling behaviour and lies and for her statement that she intends to publish that story collection independently without its writer’s consent.
Screenshots of Sylvia’s blog prove her to be lying about having had nothing to do with the project.
She was sacked from it for attempted industrial espionage and for messaging the writers involved that I had censored their work - which I never did nor ever intended to do. She did it out of spite after I caught her putting people off being involved in the project - which is open to all writers of SecondLife, not exclusively to the ones who Sylvia wanted involved. I told her it’s one rule for all. She reacted by lying to everyone about me.
The ‘disputed writer’ she refers to - has no problem that I published their work. They were actually surprised I had published the story because they had assumed it was not good enough, after Sylvia gave them a critique of it which destroyed their confidence as a writer.
The date they learned the story had been included in the compilation is after the date Sylvia sent this email. Which meant the writer was in the dark about it and about Sylvia discussing that particular story with other people. While I had kept the writers who are involved in the project up to date with events by sending out notifications, this writer had not read the updates.
I had not time to double check with all those involved on a one-to-one because the book was published ahead of intended schedule, to give it a level of legal protection. This was done as a direct result of Sylvia stating on her website her intention to publish the collection independently, without of the writers consent, which upset several of them. She said this after she was removed from the position of manager because of her aggressive and controlling behaviour and her refusal to take accountability for her own actions which included lying about me to the writers.
Sylvia refuses to assimilate the actual evidence showing the situation for what it is, because it debunks her narrative and exposes her for manipulation and for causing drama and problems for people.
What’s Sylvia is doing is scapegoating onto me by projecting at me, what she herself has been caught for doing. The time difference between the beginning of November and halfway through January, when she sent that email, and then halfway through March when she sent a string of emails, shows that she is holding onto this and will not let it go.
Periodically, she messages me to complain about it. This is her guilty conscience not yet having resolved the issue of her refusing to accept accountability, and causing other people problems because of it. By lying about them! Because she’s involving third parties who do not even know me into this, she slandering me to them. She’s admitted this in her emails. She does this for attention validation, she calls it being supported by her community who do not yet realise she’s lying to them too.
Here is the pattern;
Sylvia makes a false allegation about me. I debun I it and show evidence, thus exposing her. She accuses me of being obsessive because I debunked it. Time goes on. Repeat.
I have a right to defend myself against her defamation and harassment campaign, which is what I’m doing by posting the evidence in public about what is going on. So people can assess the evidence for themselves. She describes that as an example that I’m obsessed. I’m not obsessed I’m defending myself from her and protecting other people who become aware of what she’s doing.
What I’m posting here in this blog is a response to emails she has sent me throughout this year covering a span of months. It’s not me who’s obsessed; she’s projecting that onto me also.